Being and the Absolute
And Development of the Idea of Being
AREA
3 WHAT ARE THE TRANSFORMATIONS AND DYNAMICS OF BEING?
What is the Dynamics of Being?
Dynamics
involves the idea of cause, or the interactions that are essential in change.
The dynamics of being is the involvement or character of involvement of being
in its own change. The keys are knowledge, choice based in knowledge and action
stemming from choice
Criteria and selection for the elements and the dynamics
Criteria: From the foregoing considerations
the elements should satisfy at least the following. 1. Derive from experience
with being human...and with the sub-form of matter. They should therefore
reflect the fundamental ontological character of animal and human being.
Demonstrate from origins in “no-thing” the phenomenology of the world and
mind...including the origin or primality of awareness and the phenomenology of
world and mind including the apparent dualisms of subject-object, mind-mater,
process-being or action-being. 2. Be sufficient to provide and generate both
process and path of discovery human being in search of itself - and of
Being...be sufficient to requirements for discovery and exploration in the
levels of being
Selection: I have experimented with various
elements. I started with being and process. I may even have started with matter
and process but matter is clearly too restrictive. Relationship seemed to be
necessary in terms of the interactions among being and among process and
between being and process. In a sense being includes process but it is
convenient to start without this as an explicit position...and to allow a
reinterpretation as being-process. Humans are in process but not merely in
process - we make choices and act. I know this is a loaded assertion and there
are times when I may think as I might on a Sunday afternoon picnic
[non-aggressive thinking] but what if I24 have a destiny? I also want to
sometimes think as though there is a raging river to be crossed without the
luxury of an eternity for the crossing. As though I am at the edge of reality…
So I incorporated action which includes process. Similarly, meaning includes
and is in a way generic for relationship. In a number of ways relationship is
included in being but its explicit inclusion in the elements enables the
presentation of an explicit dynamics. I regarded - and regard - knowledge as an
important but it can be seen as part of being or alternately as a form of
relationship
The
elements of the dynamics are:
B...
Being
M...
Meaning...including
relationship
A...
Action...change...or
process - the process of change
Being...
Natural, Social,
Universal...and Mind or Spirit or Consciousness or Awareness or Psyche
Action...
Indeterministic -Being in transition, Evolution,
Choice, Design, Quantum Phenomena...I am developing a notion of the exploration
which would be a most fundamental form of action including creation, discovery,
experiments in being, geographical discovery and migration...and
Deterministic - all of the foregoing
non-deterministic processes have deterministic phases we could call those phases
“Being stays at home”, the stable phase in the rise and fall...Classical
Phenomena
Real
Action: It is
important to note that for action to be creative it is necessary for there to
be interaction between indeterminate and determinate phases. For example
indeterminism has been criticized as the basis of ethical choice since it is
“completely random.” But when indeterminism acts upon a structured base choice
is possible in ethics that while not completely rational is not completely
a-rational...and creation is possible in evolution, knowledge and discovery
that also include elements of intuition and inspiration and of rationality. It
is interesting that evolution by variation by selection and quantum mechanics
provide models at different levels and in different ways of
determinate-indeterminate process that make for the growth of structure.
Variation and selection - the distinction, when one recognizes the
underlying dynamics, may be approximations of description - may be a trial
prototype for action. Thus these disciplines may provide some elements of a
“foundation” of mind and creativity...and of concept and elaboration of action.
However, as noted in Consciousness, Mind and the World I prefer to have
foundation in the common25...and believe that such foundation
of the fundamental truths are possible and desirable as more robust and more
accessible
Primary
action or
exploration is the relation b « B or individual being in search of -
or in relation with - Being. This defines exploration. All sub-actions [and
sub-objectives...and this may be seen as a dual problem] are found in
exploration
Relation...
Or
Meaning...Knowledge26, Communication, Force...Relate to
Heidegger’s idea of care
Life
codes the conditions of its ongoing existence. Humankind further codes and
creates through symbols and language in culture. These codings or ability to
code, are evolutionary adaptations. This is true even in alienation and
“deconstruction.” This is placement in the elements of universal process which,
as matter of course, contains “stabs” of creation and results that are
occasionally more than transient. Yet these are the processes of the Absolute.
Meaning, even with its stable-unstable character, is placement in the Absolute,
participation in the Real
The
dynamics is
Being
is in relationship...individual beings relate to one another
Relationship
- meaning - generates action
Action
results in, is, or equates to change in being
Analogical sources for the dynamics
In
physical science:
I mean such theories as Newtonian Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics and the Dynamics
of Matter and Gravitation as formulated in the General Theory of Relativity
In
biology and philosophy: the dynamics of evolution - variation and selection; in metaphysics
or ontology - the balance between indeterminism and determinism in the
generation of structure
I
am not thinking of immediately applying these dynamics to the present case.
Rather, they have a certain precision and a certain developed form expressed in
the process language of calculus that may be a good metaphor for clarity and
accuracy in the dynamics of being
There
is a need to be careful that the clarity of the analytical and physical theories
should not lead to erroneous analogical thinking
The
use of dynamics
One
must first know structure. Physical description is too basic and incomplete
despite its possible metaphorical use. Consciousness as conceived in Consciousness,
Mind and the World is a beginning. From Consciousness and from observation
of nature: being is constituted of beings...and the aggregate of such beings
constitute Being
Using the analogies - examples
The following are intended as examples
and as analogical...systematic, comprehensive and derived treatment - as far as
it is a good thing - is being developed in ongoing explorations. The
conclusions also follow from common experience
Relativity and Gravitation: In phases of existence, the
universe is constituted of local beings [b] that explore, learn, remember,
correct, transform and grow. Relationship, communication and dialog are prior
to rigid coordination or knowledge...and the “sum” of [b] in relation and
process [meaning, action] is Being B
Quantum Theory: Superposed on the determinate phase above. [1] In a
universal sense F = B.
[2] There is a
basis for local growth, evolution of [b]. [3] Accepting quantum realism as
fundamental, i.e. quantum dynamics Þ geometry Þ gravitation;
additionally, hypothesizing unification of the known forces [gravitation,
electro-weak and strong]: there is one force, the force of some grand unified
theory whose geometrodynamics includes all physical being. Translate this
metaphorically: B, the one principle, is universally
and locally creative...creation requires asymmetry and this Þ decay, destruction; a perfectly symmetric universe
would last forever but would have lasted forever - it would not evolve and
could not have come into being; since the conditions of existence includes
“laws” these must also include asymmetry; less asymmetry Þ slower creation and evolution but richer and longer
lasting [more stable] existence Þ
near symmetry in a universe that is rich in structure
Neurology: Memory and processing are in the same place / are
dynamically interactive - at the neuro-physiological level and functionally:
processing includes laying down of memory; memory conditions and gives context
and so on to processing. This is a case of B = B-M-A. More
generally this implies the integration of organism, of organisms [society] and
organism. Metaphorically: this reminds us of the physical integration of the
elements through the conditions of genesis and, generally, of the integration
of [b], M, A to constitute B
Evolutionary biology: In life the “function” of relationship becomes
specialized as the functions of coding [genetics] and function [soma, body.] In
mind the conditions of evolution become internalized: mind - or an
aspect of mind - is adaptability - being adapted to adapt
Philosophy: Despite the various differentiations - internal/external,
subject/object, mode and monad/whole, B = B-M-A...before all else
comes presence or being in Being
The
following is an expression of what has been said on derivation from common
experience
The
essential truths are few simple
The
path may be difficult, detailed, rich...and recreated again and again at many
places and throughout history
The
truths are accessible to and best known from common experience
...with
trial and persistence...and support from specialized disciplines or study. This
naturally brings into question the nature of these disciplines and whether they
are not common after all and if so how to render them as such
This
raises the question of the nature of special intuition e.g. the intuition
of an Einstein in theoretical physics or a Ramanujan in number theory. The
etiology of such intuition is a complex issue - the questions of nature,
nurture including self-nurture, circumstance, cultivation, receptivity, memory
and imagination... However, to raise the question of etiology and to suggest
its importance and utility, or to suggest the centrality of common experience
is not to deny the singularity or brilliance of special intuition, ability and
accomplishment. Further, the existence of special intuition, rather than
casting a shadow on common experience, shows or exemplifies the intimate
connection of human being with Being
These
truths...and the present principles follow from the nature of being, of who we
are
The
most important relation is with all being
This
does not deny the particulars...each day, disappointments, sunsets, ambitions,
jobs, family, mountains...which, after all, are among the elements that
constitute ‘ultimate being.’