EVOLUTION, DESIGN AND THE ABSOLUTE
ANIL MITRA PHD, COPYRIGHT © 2001, REVISED June 2003
EVOLUTION, DESIGN AND THE ABSOLUTE
The origin of this
document is in Evolution and Design, 1987 – as a continuation of that
essay and as a complement to its approach and emphasis. In the earlier essay,
evolution was used as a paradigmatic basis of understanding the world –cosmos
and being– and of the nature of understanding and knowledge in general. The
basis of Evolution and Design was, to some extent, material and temporal. It
was atemporal in that evolution need not be seen as temporal but, instead, a
system of explanation from the present. Evolution and Design focused on the
material as fundamental but was not exclusive of the mental or of
being-as-such. The primary alternatives to the approach described are in Being, Mind and the Absolute and in Being and the Elements of Being [these essays are outdated
and replaced by Journey
in Being]
This essay
continues the move away from the material and the temporal while still focusing
on the themes of evolution and design as explanatory. The first version of this
essay will outline and comment on the set of themes below
The end result of the move away from the material and the temporal – a
process that balances them with being but does not eliminate them – is in Journey
in Being. The present essay continues to have interest to me as the
continuation of Evolution and Design into the realm of the absolute and as
a source for Journey
in Being
Document status: June 11, 2003
Maintain: active
Long term: may develop, may incorporate into Journey in Being / Evolution and Design
Intrinsic interest
Evolution, Design and the Absolute
Evolution is the
set of processes, from origins, that arrive at or produce the world – as it is.
Origins refer to an earlier, simpler, state. The earliest, most simple
state would be nothing or nothingness
We do not
necessarily expect that the processes would be uniform in nature; thus we
expect an initial phase of formation of the physical elements that might
involve processes are not physical as currently
conceived. There would then follow physical, chemical, biological and social
evolution. This list is not meant to exhaust the possibilities but is given as
an indication. We could, perhaps, include mental and spiritual evolution.
Mental evolution may be considered to be part of biological evolution
Evolution as fact
is distinct from a theory or mechanism of evolution – or a set of theories and
mechanisms. There is an ideal in which there is continuity of explanation – one
theory or body of theory or set of mechanisms would explain the facts of
evolution
The explanatory
mechanism of variation and selection may be such a universal mechanism of
evolution from nothingness. It explains large portions of biological evolution
and the work of Lee Smolin shows that it may also apply to physical evolution.
My own writing [Metaphysics,
map
of my world] shows how variation and selection may apply to origins from
nothing – the origins of causation, of time and space and of physical law. If
it seems paradoxical to talk of the origin of time we may replace “time” by
“time as we know it” or similar phrase
Evolution
as fact and evolutionary modes of explanation. What metaphysics and epistemology can
learn from evolution. The path to timeless explanation
through evolution
Origins
as a source of explanation. There is one and only one universe that extends beyond the known
universe in known ways – duration, extension, modes of being… - and in,
possibly, unknown ways. Consider that the universe may have originated from
some simple state; the simplest such state is that of nothing or nothingness.
Is this true? Even if the universe has not originated from such a state, could
it have? How would this be shown? From the transactional nature of the universe
– only in rationality is there an absolute split? From indeterminism and the
co-eval origins of laws and being – being includes
laws? From the relative nature of the absolutes that we
assign to nature? What can be learnt from common origins? Note that
indeterminism does not at all exclude structure: there is a selection effect
for stable states. Such stability is relative rather than absolute.
Indeterminism is the “mechanism” of change from stable form; selection is the
persistence of newer stable forms relative to less stable forms
Organisms as
coding of the world
Adaptability
as adaptation – the evolution of adaptability; evolution incarnate. Through adaptability, the organism affects
its own destiny and evolution of the group. This is a characterization of mind:
evolution internalized as part the organism’s own processing and function
Mind as Mind as
having origins vs. mind as coeval with being and existence
The origin of mind
in the efficiency of modeling [in combination with physical exploration] over
mere physical exploration
Being-Meaning-Action…
or entity-relationship-process as fundamental modes
The
real meanings of knowledge and truth as essential to the understanding of being
and the absolute. The
modern meanings are a phase of the real meanings. Taking the latest elaboration
or phase as the essence leads to limited concepts, understanding of being and
possibilities for being
Evolution and
Design considers relations
between “blind” and conscious evolution… and origins of conscious evolution in
mechanism
For detailed
considerations see Evolution and Design, 1987
Design vs.
mechanism. Design and mind. Design as having origins.
The potential of design, even though origins are local, to pervade the
universe: a catalytic or phase change
The origin of
knowledge and design in the elaboration of process as action: feeling – will –
knowledge – design – action
Linear models are of the type:
Awareness of needs - define problem – synthesize
general or conceptual solution, specify solution parameters – analyze
and optimize – evaluate – implement; repeat
Some further elements in complex, social or large scale projects: acceptance of the problem or consensus; information gathering; communication including persuasion. Finally, review of impact – reusable elements of design, contribution to general knowledge – science, technology and other disciplines; social and environmental impact; implications for policy – social, economic, political, technology…
Priority models are multilevel models based in the elements of Linear design:
[Evolved intellect includes informal design from the nature of the function of intellect. Formal design, i.e., the manipulation of design follows closely.]
Design elements: e.g., the elements of the linear model
Value and priority elements:
Allocating resources for design
Priorities: selecting and acting upon element[s] of current focus; includes design and second order elements; may be formalized with especial distinction between design and second order elements; default: linear design
Reviewing the nature of design, the elements – first and second order
Learning
[feedback] and branching are automatically included
A variety of
meanings of the absolute; relationships among the meanings – the meanings of
the absolute are elaborated in a number of documents. Timeless.
Living in the here-now. Accepting a limit is the first step to overcoming; the
absolute does not begin at an infinite place or time but here-now “I am here in
this mountain meadow; here and now begins my universe…” The whole picture:
integration over all time and space – extension and duration or change are more
fundamental than space and time
The being that is
and knows all; the meaning of this depends on the meaning of “is” and “knows.” Relation of the absolute to perception. There is a timeless
“is” and a flowing “knows” that allows for the immediate, as in the previous
paragraph, to be absolute… and, perhaps, identical, even, to the temporal, and
critical meanings the “all” and the infinite as determinate
Some other words:
atemporal, all, one, infinite, and eternal
Opposition
to the characteristics of Evolution. Beyond, containing evolution
Sources for the absolute
include the literature; Being,
Mind and the Absolute and Being
and the Elements of Being: First Local Edition:
The Absolute has
meanings in logic, ethics and aesthetics… here I am concerned with the real or
metaphysical meaning
That which does
not express relationship e.g. “Plato” but not “teacher;” intrinsic, perfect vs.
comparative; real vs. appearance; not subject to conditions or reservations
In philosophy and
metaphysics: that which is independent of or unconditioned and unconstrained by
anything else – self-sufficient, fundamental, ultimate; the autonomous;
primordial, uncaused – at once cause and no cause; substance; necessary truth;
that which permits meaning and its continuity
Substance whose
necessary mechanisms and transformations produce the world – is there a role
for combinatorial growth; substance is undifferentiated or minimally
differentiated, enduring, not transmutable in its intrinsic nature but variable
in its forms
Absolute being: has no being, no essence, and no quality but is the source
of all being, essence and quality; for whom originating the world is not an
effort or an action
The absolute has
no being, no essence, no quality but is the source of
all being, essence and quality. God as eternal, as cause, as creator is
absolute…
The idea of the
absolute is present in Plato and the idea and the term in Aquinas, Benedict
Spinoza, Bruno… its vogue is due to the German Idealists – Fichte, Schelling,
Hegel…
Patristic and
scholastic Christianity: the creator God, the Ens
Realissimum, Ens Perfectissimum, Sui Causa, and the god of mysticism generally
– Erigena, Hugo of St. Victor, Cusa, Boehme, Bruno
Ens – being in its most general sense, with
least possible qualification and determination
Sui Causa – self-creation,
causing itself
Nicholas of Cusa:
referred to God as “the absolute”
Spinoza described
substance as absolutely infinite “self-existing, independent, unconditional
ground of all that exists” in contrast with its ultimate attributes which are
each infinite in their kind
Vaihinger – the
ultimate fiction | Hamilton, Spencer – the unknown… the unconditioned,
therefore unknowable real
Kant – unknowable…
the Ideas of reason seek both the absolute totality of conditions and their
absolutely unconditioned ground
Theists – God; pantheists
– universe
Schopenhauer –
will | Bergson – life force characterized by creative evolution | Fecher –
consciousness | Bradley – experience | Joel – the potential of all that is real
| Lotze and Royce – self-conscious personality | Alexander – space time matrix
of all reality | Fichte – the Ground of the Real is the Absolute Ego
Schelling – primordial
World Ground, unity behind all logical and ontological oppositions,
self-differentiating source of both Mind and Nature
Hegel – universal
spirit, which by dialectic process takes on one predicate after another until
it manifests itself as an objective world in perfect harmony with reason
Primal being has existential answers… negated in the delusions of
modernism which is the opposite of magic i.e. the absolute separation of word
and object
Science: universe
= nothing
Vivekananda – the eternal religion behind
all religions, recognizes the Absolute as a state of pure consciousness
identical with the true self without a second
Change vs.
constancy or temporality vs. timelessness. In the sense that a temporally
indeterministic universe –the future evolution is not determined by the present
state– may visit all possible states, the universe is given or deterministic
An
outline: Origins, Knowledge, Design, Evolution, Philosophy, Dynamics,
Experience, Action and Learning, The Absolute, Destiny
ANIL
MITRA PHD, COPYRIGHT © 2001 AND REVISED Wednesday,
June 11, 2003 11:56:04
PM
ANIL MITRA | RESUME | HORIZONS ENTERPRISES™ | HOME | SITE-MAP | USEFUL
LINKS | CONTACT
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND